| Eli Lilly Dec 31, 2004, 12:28p
 
 UPDATE: According to a statement by El Lilly, the papers that BMJ received regarding Prozac's negative effects were given to federal regulators in the 80s and 90s.  So unless further news surfaces, it appears that Eli Lilly is cleared from charge #1.  Issue #2 below (buying a court verdict) still remains, which is despicable but not as damning as both issues together.
 
 ORIGINAL STORY:
 I just read an article about how Eli Lilly, the company that makes Prozac, did two extremely unethical things:
 
 1) Eli Lilly hid evidence in 1994 that Prozac causes increased levels of agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, and aggressiveness.  SSRIs like Prozac have recently come under scrutiny as potentially increasing the risks of suicide in young adults.  It seems that Eli Lilly knew that Prozac could cause similar behavior in all patients, including adults.  They knew this at least 10 years ago, and told no one.  A report describing this was sent anonymously to the British Medical Journal recently.
 
 2) Eli Lilly nearly got away with buying a court verdict in a related case in 1994, and would have if not for the vigilant judge on the case. Eli Lilly was sued by the family of a man named Wesbecker who shot and killed 8 co-workers and wounded 12 before killing himself in 1989.  The man had started taking fluoxetine (Prozac) one month before the shooting.
 
 The plaintiffs in the Wesbecker product liability sought to show that Eli Lilly withheld negative study data from the FDA and that fluoxetine tipped Wesbecker over into a homicidal rage. Lilly won a 9 to 3 jury verdict in late 1994 and subsequently claimed that it was "proven in a court of law... that Prozac is safe and effective."(Full article from the British Medical Journal)
 The trial judge, Justice John Potter, suspecting that a secret deal had been struck, pursued Lilly and the plaintiffs, eventually forcing Lilly in 1997 to admit that it had made a secret settlement with the plaintiffs during the trial. Infuriated by Lilly's actions, Judge Potter ordered the finding changed from a verdict in Lilly's favour to one of "dismissed as settled with prejudice," saying, "Lilly sought to buy not just the verdict but the court's judgment as well."
 
 If you're taking any of Eli Lilly's other popular drugs, it may be worthwhile to (a) talk to your doctor about them and (b) research and consider alternatives that provide similar effect.
 (from Eli Lilly's website) Alimta, a chemotherapy regimen to treat patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who are not candidates for surgery
 Symbyax, for bipolar depression
 Cialis, for erectile dysfunction
 Stratterra, a nonstimulant, noncontrolled medication for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults
 Forteo, for osteoporosis patients that stimulates new bone formation
 Xigris, for adult severe-sepsis patients at a high risk of death
 Evista, for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
 Zyprexa, for schizophrenia and acute mania associated with bipolar disorder
 Humalog, an insulin product
 Gemzar, for pancreatic and non-small-cell lung cancer
 Humatrope, therapy for growth hormone deficiency
 Prozac
 Humulin, human insulin
 Ceclor, an oral antibiotic
 Iletin, an insulin product, available since 1923
 No comments - Write 1st Comment
 
    
    « Book Notes: Mohammad Yunus' Banker to the Poor
 - 
 
2 Degrees of Self-Reference - Talking about talking about talking » |